While the push towards price transparency is important, we still are not 100% of the way there.
Price transparency is a growing trend in healthcare today – after all, in what other industry do you not understand at least an estimate of what you are going to owe for an item or service prior to making a purchase? While healthcare has nuances that make this extremely difficult (the unplanned emergency room visit or inpatient admission, or complication that arises during surgery come to mind), the concept of price transparency has been gaining steam since the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010. The new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Price Transparency Final Rule aims to further demystify healthcare costs through requirements around publishing detailed charge information for all hospital items and services as well as providing “patient-friendly” information on certain shoppable services.
While the push towards price transparency is important and the new CMS rule will take us further along that journey, we still are not 100% of the way there. From a patient perspective, arguably the most important factor in understanding what your personal out-of-pocket cost will be for any set of hospital services is your insurance benefits, not the gross charge, cash price, or even negotiated rate. Those benefits, after all, dictate how much you will pay before your insurance begins to provide coverage (deductible), how much you will owe in a cost-share once your insurance kicks in (co-insurance), and how much at maximum you’ll owe in any given benefit year (out-of-pocket maximum). Charges and negotiated rate certainly play a role, but even the most healthcare-literate patients will still struggle to understand personal cost without understanding their benefits. Some hospitals have or are taking the initiative to move a step further in incorporating that benefit information into estimates, but per the CMS rule there is still an inherent gap in true price transparency from a patient perspective.
CMS is looking to take the next step in creating a format for and enforcing price transparency in healthcare. Their new rule will require hospitals to both:
The new regulations will go into effect January 1, 2021. While there has been resistance to this date due to capacity constraints given the COVID-19 pandemic, the rule is still expected to take effect as planned.
An additional effort to challenge the legality of the ruling in requiring hospitals to publish privately negotiated rates by the American Hospital Association and other provider groups is pending appeal.
If you are a licensed hospital in any state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rica, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands or the Northern Mariana Islands, you will need to have both your comprehensive machine-readable file and 300 shoppable services publicly available by January 1, 2021.
Need help getting started? Follow the five steps below to start and stay on the right track:
Haven’t started on this work, or strapped for time given COVID response demands? Whether you’re looking to simply comply with price transparency requirements by the January 1st deadline or using this as an opportunity to begin a larger patient financial experience transformation, the team at Eutemia can work with you to meet your goals. Reach out!
Sources:
“Medicare and Medicaid Programs: CY 2020 Hospital Outpatient PPS Policy Changes and Payment Rates and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment System Policy Changes and Payment Rates. Price Transparency Requirements for Hospitals To Make Standard Charges Public.” Federal Register, 27 Nov. 2019, www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/11/27/2019-24931/medicare-and-medicaid-programs-cy-2020-hospital-outpatient-pps-policy-changes-and-payment-rates-and.
Morse, Susan. “American Hospital Association to Appeal Ruling on Price Transparency Lawsuit.” Healthcare Finance News, 23 June 2020, www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/american-hospital-association-appeal-ruling-price-transparency-lawsuit.